Adaptation as a Means to an End: Conceptual Underpinnings and Empirical Affirmations
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Science Publishing Group
Abstract
Rooted in the concept of adaptation are change, action, stimulus, means and end. Whilst these elements are
fundamental in clarifying the complex actor relationships surrounding adaptation, literature has tended to concentrate on the
end (adaptation practice). Inherent in the provisions of interventions aimed at minimizing the specific impacts of climate
change is the notion that adaptation will be automatically triggered. This article, which focuses on concepts and theories,
argues that adaptation is more than mere action or what is usually described as the end. Using the Theory of Action (ToA) and
the Framework for Analyzing Climate Change Adaptation as Actions (FACCAA), this article attempts to clarify the
relationships between the key terminologies and contributes to knowledge on the adaptation discourse. Using empirical shreds
of evidence from the Talensi District, the article underscores the proposition that water interventions are not necessarily
adaptation practices neither are they automatic activators of adaptation. They are rather means expected to propel action for
adaptation. The article concludes that elements, such as change, action, and means, are of equal importance as the popularly
documented adaptation practice (end). All the elements deserve equal attention to unravel the complexities underpinning the
concept of adaptation.
Description
This article is published by Science Publishing Group, 2022 and is also available at doi: 10.11648/j.ajese.20220604.11
Keywords
Citation
American Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering 2022; 6(4): 155-164