DSpace
 

KNUSTSpace >
Research Articles >
College of Engineering >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11339

Title: Incorporating joint flexibilty in collapse risk assessment of nonductile rc buildings
Authors: Banahene Osei, Jack
Adom-Asamoah, Mark
Issue Date: Mar-2017
Abstract: Several two-dimensional analytical beam column joint models with varying complexities have been proposed in quantifying joint flexibility during seismic vulnerability assessment of non-ductile reinforced concrete (RC) frames. Notable models are the single component rotational spring element and the super element joint model that can effectively capture the governing inelastic mechanisms under severe ground motions. Even though both models have been extensively calibrated and verified using quasi-static test of joint sub-assemblages, a comparative study of the inelastic seismic responses under nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) of RC frames has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study employs three hypothetical case study RC frames subjected to increasing ground motion intensities to study their inherent variations. Secondly the issue of superelement joint models causing numerical divergence in non-linear time history analysis of reinforced concrete frames is investigated. The rigid joint assumption and a single rotational spring model are implemented for comparison. Reinforced concrete joint subassemblages and a one-third scaled frame have been employed for model validation. Results indicate that the super element joint model overestimates the transient drift ratio at the first story and becomes highly un-conservative by under-predicting the drift ratios at the roof level when compared to the single-component model and the conventional rigid joint assumption. In addition, between these story levels, a decline in the drift ratios is observed as the story level increased. However, from this limited study, there is no consistent evidence to suggest that care should be taken in selecting either a single or multi component joint model for seismic risk assessment of buildings when a global demand measure such as maximum inter-story drift is employed in the seismic assessment framework. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis also indicates that super-element joint model may be less vulnerable relative to the single-component joint model. Furthermore, the shift in fragility function may lie in between the rigid joint and single-component joint modelling schemes, implying non-divergence.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11339
Appears in Collections:College of Engineering

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
KNUSTDCESTRENG2017TR1.pdf2.77 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback