DSpace
 

KNUSTSpace >
Research Articles >
College of Engineering >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11325

Title: Effect of Design Ductility on the Progressive Collapse Potential of RC Frame Structures Designed to Eurocode 8
Authors: Adom-Asamoah, Mark
Obeng Ankamah, Nobel
Keywords: Design Ductility
Progressive Collapse
RC Frames
Eurocode 8
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: Mark Adom-Asamoah, Nobel Obeng Ankamah. Effect of Design Ductility on the Progressive Collapse Potential of RC Frame Structures Designed to Eurocode 8. American Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, pp. 24-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20160402.11
Abstract: Progressive collapse is the cause of most structural failures around the world. The US General Service Administration (GSA) has presented guidelines for the assessment of the vulnerability of building structures to progressive collapse. It has been established in literature that the philosophy of ductility and redundancy used in seismic design is beneficial in resisting progressive collapse but not accounted for in these guidelines. The GSA methodology is particularly suited to seismic codes which allows for a constant member rotation but may be unsuitable to other codes that makes provision for ductility level. In this study, an investigation into the progressive collapse potential of RC framed structures designed to the seismic design code, EC 8, with varying design ground accelerations and ductility classes under different column loss scenarios was done. Based on the EC 8, a criteria for maximum plastic rotations and dynamic multiplies for progressive collapse analysis was proposed. These proposed criteria, together with the GSA criteria, were used to investigate the designed structures. The EC 8 criteria proved that buildings designed for higher ductilities yield at lower loads but undergo greater deformations and absorbs more energy to resist collapse. On the other hand, buildings designed for lower ductilities have higher yield loads but undergo lower deformations before collapse. Higher PGAs result in higher yield strengths but does not necessarily deformation capacity. This effect of ductility was not seen with the GSA criteria since a constant rotation capacity was recommended for all the buildings regardless of design ductility. It was also found that the removals of a corner column possess the greatest threat to progressive collapse on a building.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11325
ISSN: 2330-8729 (Print)
2330-8737 (Online)
Appears in Collections:College of Engineering

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Effect of Design Ductility on the Progressive Collapse Potential of RC Frame Structures Designed to Eurocode 8.pdf3.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback